<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Washington D.C. Metblogs &#187; NotEasyBeingGreen Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.metblogs.com/tag/noteasybeinggreen-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.metblogs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='dc.metblogs.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Not Easy Being Green: Air</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2009/04/21/not-easy-being-green-air/</link>
		<comments>http://dc.metblogs.com/2009/04/21/not-easy-being-green-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonigm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NotEasyBeingGreen Air]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=8494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing about air, you see, is that there is a lot of it.  And it&#8217;s free &#8212; there&#8217;s no &#8220;DC Department of Air&#8221; that delivers clean, tested stuff to your door.  Then again, a lot of things (that we don&#8217;t pay for) affect our air quality.  In the city, it&#8217;s mostly heavy and off-road [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_8498" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 419px"><img class="size-full wp-image-8498" src="http://dc.metblogs.com/files/2009/04/sunset.jpg" alt="sunset" width="409" height="183" /><p class="wp-caption-text">props to Jonathan Hoff on flickr</p></div>
<p>The thing about air, you see, is that there is a lot of it.  And it&#8217;s free &#8212; there&#8217;s no &#8220;<a href="http://dc.gov/mayor/index.shtm?portal_link=hr" target="_blank">DC Department of Air</a>&#8221; that delivers clean, tested stuff to your door.  Then again, a lot of things (that we don&#8217;t pay for) affect our air quality.  In the city, it&#8217;s mostly heavy and off-road vehicles &#8212; trucks, buses, earthmovers &#8211; and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/01/capitol-hills-coal-fueled-power-plant-dims-clean-energy-hopes/" target="_blank">that coal-burning power plant on Capitol Hill</a>.  But regular cars and light trucks, heating, ventilatilation, and air conditioning (<a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/bd4379a92ceceeac8525735900400c27/75dd89b912d671ea8525712c0073f202!OpenDocument" target="_blank">HVAC</a>) systems, manufacturing, and even human and animal digestion &#8212; all affect the air we breathe, as well as do sun, wind, and heat.  Air is both <a href="http://www.societyforchaostheory.org/tutorials/" target="_blank">chaotic and complex</a>, two things that make a system very difficult to model using our limited tools of mathematics and computer science. </p>
<p>The upshot is that we don&#8217;t understand it very well.  We mostly know there is a problem with the air and that the changing composition means the air is overall a titch warmer than it used to be.  And we mostly agree that this is a result of people using the air.  And we mostly think this warming trend is Not Good.  What nobody knows very well is what to do about it. </p>
<p>In a situation like this, looking at history is always interesting to me; I like the example of the government&#8217;s well-meant efforts to make cars more efficient by regulating the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Average_Fuel_Economy" target="_blank">corporate average fuel economy (CAFE)</a>.  Instead of resulting in more small cars on the road, the car industry figured out how to sell us trucks (ie, SUVs) that weren&#8217;t covered by the rule.  These larger vehicles will finally be regulated in 2011, more than 35 years after the law was enacted.  This is a great example of unintended consequences and the need to reckon with clever capitalists.  Well-meaning people regulated lead of out gasoline back then, too.  <a href="http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/lead-poisoning/fl00068/dsection=symptoms" target="_blank">Lead is pretty awful stuff</a> when it <a href="http://www.dcwasa.com/waterquality/faqs.cfm#lead" target="_blank">ends up in drinking water</a> and the easiest way to keep kids safe is not to use it at all.  But <a href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo499.html" target="_blank">recent</a> <a href="http://http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/2009-04-19-geoengineering_N.htm" target="_blank">speculation</a> points to lower lead levels as a precursor to global warming (thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/2020science" target="_blank">@2020science</a> for the links!). </p>
<p>Unfortunately, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_of_Hazardous_Substances_Directive" target="_blank">eliminating lead</a> also means none of those kids can <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/03/research.engineering" target="_blank">use</a> their <a href="http://editorials.teamxbox.com/xbox/1651/The-Red-Ring-of-Death/p1/" target="_blank">XBOX 360s</a>, but those consequences, they just keep coming.  And now we mean well when we talk about limiting carbon emissions.  I fear the unintended consequences.  Who knows, we could be stuck with a lot of boring sunsets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dc.metblogs.com/2009/04/21/not-easy-being-green-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
