<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Washington Nationals Overhaul: 08-09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:33:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maybe There Is Some Hope For The Nationals &#124; Washington D.C. Metblogs</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14913</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe There Is Some Hope For The Nationals &#124; Washington D.C. Metblogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14913</guid>
		<description>[...] I explained in my offseason plan for the Nats, they could be next. Many of the pieces are in place for our local baseball team to charge on to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I explained in my offseason plan for the Nats, they could be next. Many of the pieces are in place for our local baseball team to charge on to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Marenna</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14869</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Marenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14869</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got a great point. I&#039;m curious to know what you think of the rest of my shopping list. Thanks for being a good sport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got a great point. I&#8217;m curious to know what you think of the rest of my shopping list. Thanks for being a good sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgemf</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14868</link>
		<dc:creator>pgemf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14868</guid>
		<description>Much higher?? If Flores had 6 more hits and 2 more walks, he would have the same AVG and OBP as Pudge.  Not exactly Tony Gwynn esque.

He does know the pitchers alot better, but why would you pay $4-5 million or so for a catcher that is not a major upgrade defensively, is older, is a downgrade offensively, and retards the development of a person who is at worst equal, and at best a better overall catcher right now, when that money could be better applied elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much higher?? If Flores had 6 more hits and 2 more walks, he would have the same AVG and OBP as Pudge.  Not exactly Tony Gwynn esque.</p>
<p>He does know the pitchers alot better, but why would you pay $4-5 million or so for a catcher that is not a major upgrade defensively, is older, is a downgrade offensively, and retards the development of a person who is at worst equal, and at best a better overall catcher right now, when that money could be better applied elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Marenna</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14866</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Marenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14866</guid>
		<description>You may have a point. But don&#039;t forget:
1) Pudge hits for a much higher average than Flores does. He also has a significantly higher on base percentage. Flores has a superior slugging percentage, but other than that it&#039;s a dead heap.
2) As for calling games, I haven&#039;t heard any complaints about Flores either. But it is not disputable that Pudge knows the major league hitters a lot better. It is also indisputable that he can nurture a young staff far better than Flores- the young pitchers are peers to Flores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have a point. But don&#8217;t forget:<br />
1) Pudge hits for a much higher average than Flores does. He also has a significantly higher on base percentage. Flores has a superior slugging percentage, but other than that it&#8217;s a dead heap.<br />
2) As for calling games, I haven&#8217;t heard any complaints about Flores either. But it is not disputable that Pudge knows the major league hitters a lot better. It is also indisputable that he can nurture a young staff far better than Flores- the young pitchers are peers to Flores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgemf</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14865</link>
		<dc:creator>pgemf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14865</guid>
		<description>Your quote: &quot;The guy is only 24 years old. I don’t see the logic in allowing him to stay in the majors to only hit .256. The other guys in the league hitting at .256 are contributing with either a lot of home-runs or a lot of stolen bases&quot;

And again, my reply is not all guys who hit .256 are catchers.  If Flores was a 1st baseman with those numbers, you would have a point.  Never once have you heard anyone complain about the way Flores calls a game.  So if the defense/game calling is a slight downgrade, why would you take an older, more expensive player who doesn&#039;t put up the offensive numbers Flores does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your quote: &quot;The guy is only 24 years old. I don’t see the logic in allowing him to stay in the majors to only hit .256. The other guys in the league hitting at .256 are contributing with either a lot of home-runs or a lot of stolen bases&quot;</p>
<p>And again, my reply is not all guys who hit .256 are catchers.  If Flores was a 1st baseman with those numbers, you would have a point.  Never once have you heard anyone complain about the way Flores calls a game.  So if the defense/game calling is a slight downgrade, why would you take an older, more expensive player who doesn&#8217;t put up the offensive numbers Flores does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Marenna</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14864</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Marenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14864</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t ask for stolen bases from Flores, I merely pointed out the contributions of others in the majors who hit .256. My major point is that matching young, inexperienced pitchers with young, inexperienced catchers is hardly ever a workable formula. And honestly, I think we both know the difference between Ivan Rodriguez and Paul LoDuca.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t ask for stolen bases from Flores, I merely pointed out the contributions of others in the majors who hit .256. My major point is that matching young, inexperienced pitchers with young, inexperienced catchers is hardly ever a workable formula. And honestly, I think we both know the difference between Ivan Rodriguez and Paul LoDuca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgemf</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14863</link>
		<dc:creator>pgemf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14863</guid>
		<description>Flores is the least of this teams problems. Yes there are guys who hit higher than .256 who steal bases, but THEY ARE NOT CATCHERS! Only 7 catchers in the majors stole more than 4 bases last year, and one of those played other positions.

Playing for an awful team with a minor league lineup somedays, Flores had 59 RBI&#039;s.  Only 10 catchers had more than that, and all of them had more at bats.  Flores had 97 less at bats than Pudge, and had as many home runs AND 24 more  RBI&#039;s, and you want stolen bases out of him? Are you serious?  What&#039;s next, do you want to get rid of Zimmerman because he isn&#039;t a closer?

You don&#039;t see the logic of having him in the majors. There are between 12-15 other teams he could start for today, and that is not counting probably another 6-10 that would take him over their incumbent higher paid catcher putting up similar numbers. We paid $5 million to Ivan Rodriguez last year, only his name was Paul Loduca.

Amd Chad Cordero will not be with the Nats in 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flores is the least of this teams problems. Yes there are guys who hit higher than .256 who steal bases, but THEY ARE NOT CATCHERS! Only 7 catchers in the majors stole more than 4 bases last year, and one of those played other positions.</p>
<p>Playing for an awful team with a minor league lineup somedays, Flores had 59 RBI&#8217;s.  Only 10 catchers had more than that, and all of them had more at bats.  Flores had 97 less at bats than Pudge, and had as many home runs AND 24 more  RBI&#8217;s, and you want stolen bases out of him? Are you serious?  What&#8217;s next, do you want to get rid of Zimmerman because he isn&#8217;t a closer?</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t see the logic of having him in the majors. There are between 12-15 other teams he could start for today, and that is not counting probably another 6-10 that would take him over their incumbent higher paid catcher putting up similar numbers. We paid $5 million to Ivan Rodriguez last year, only his name was Paul Loduca.</p>
<p>Amd Chad Cordero will not be with the Nats in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Marenna</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Marenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14862</guid>
		<description>Thanks for correcting my typo, Frank. I updated the article.

I considered Jesus Flores during my analysis. It is important to note that though his defense is impressive, his bat is not worthy of the major leagues yet. The guy is only 24 years old. I don&#039;t see the logic in allowing him to stay in the majors to only hit .256. The other guys in the league hitting at .256 are contributing with either a lot of home-runs or a lot of stolen bases. I think that two more years in the minors or as a backup catcher will be good for his development. That will also give the Nats the flexibility to give Pudge a cheap two year contract. We will get the defense, an on base percentage, plus the invaluable mentoring of young pitchers that he would take on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for correcting my typo, Frank. I updated the article.</p>
<p>I considered Jesus Flores during my analysis. It is important to note that though his defense is impressive, his bat is not worthy of the major leagues yet. The guy is only 24 years old. I don&#8217;t see the logic in allowing him to stay in the majors to only hit .256. The other guys in the league hitting at .256 are contributing with either a lot of home-runs or a lot of stolen bases. I think that two more years in the minors or as a backup catcher will be good for his development. That will also give the Nats the flexibility to give Pudge a cheap two year contract. We will get the defense, an on base percentage, plus the invaluable mentoring of young pitchers that he would take on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14861</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14861</guid>
		<description>Man we should just become a dedicated blog on the Nats- we love to write about them!

Thanks for the correction but 100 losses or 99- that&#039;s way too many to lose.

I agree that we can pull off a Tampa Bay like turnaround- I think it&#039;ll take longer to do it via growing talent- mostly because we need more time to develop some.

However we do have some great young talent that we can build around, I haven&#039;t thought about building through free agency but perhaps the pressure to do better will make it a prority this off-season. If so I will be excited to see a team of young talent and solid veterans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man we should just become a dedicated blog on the Nats- we love to write about them!</p>
<p>Thanks for the correction but 100 losses or 99- that&#8217;s way too many to lose.</p>
<p>I agree that we can pull off a Tampa Bay like turnaround- I think it&#8217;ll take longer to do it via growing talent- mostly because we need more time to develop some.</p>
<p>However we do have some great young talent that we can build around, I haven&#8217;t thought about building through free agency but perhaps the pressure to do better will make it a prority this off-season. If so I will be excited to see a team of young talent and solid veterans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estuartj</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/10/09/the-great-washington-nationals-overhaul-08-09/comment-page-1/#comment-14860</link>
		<dc:creator>estuartj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/?p=7214#comment-14860</guid>
		<description>What about Jesus Flores?  I think the team is set on making him the #1 Catcher so getting Pudge to play backup is unrealistic.  I put forward trading for Saltamaccia of Texas as a back-up for Flores and also fill in for Nick Johnson as needed.

I especially like the idea of signing Adam Dunn since he can play both LF and 1B so if (or when) Johnson goes down you can move Dunn to 1B and have options in the outfield.  I don&#039;t think the team can afford the dollars or roster spot to get another 1B only player.  I think Young may be done as a major league player and the club might offer him a coaching or FO job in exchange for renegotiating the remaining $5mil due him.

I like the idea of signing Garcia and Oliver Perez, not sure if both is doable, especially if the team still believes Shawn Hill can pitch.  Given what happened with Patterson this spring I think they are unlikely to give him much leeway so finding or signing a replacement now does make sense.

After last season many were expecting a FA OFer signing like Hunter, Jones or Rowand, but instead decided to upgrade the OF via trade, getting Dukes and Milledge.  If Bowden can find the necessary spare parts from within the organization I can see them attempting to trade for similair quality players to fill the void in the rotation.  Florida seems ready to move several arbitration eligble players.  The have to move Dan Uggla, but several SPers are also looking to get big raises and might be obtainable at a reasonable trade cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Jesus Flores?  I think the team is set on making him the #1 Catcher so getting Pudge to play backup is unrealistic.  I put forward trading for Saltamaccia of Texas as a back-up for Flores and also fill in for Nick Johnson as needed.</p>
<p>I especially like the idea of signing Adam Dunn since he can play both LF and 1B so if (or when) Johnson goes down you can move Dunn to 1B and have options in the outfield.  I don&#8217;t think the team can afford the dollars or roster spot to get another 1B only player.  I think Young may be done as a major league player and the club might offer him a coaching or FO job in exchange for renegotiating the remaining $5mil due him.</p>
<p>I like the idea of signing Garcia and Oliver Perez, not sure if both is doable, especially if the team still believes Shawn Hill can pitch.  Given what happened with Patterson this spring I think they are unlikely to give him much leeway so finding or signing a replacement now does make sense.</p>
<p>After last season many were expecting a FA OFer signing like Hunter, Jones or Rowand, but instead decided to upgrade the OF via trade, getting Dukes and Milledge.  If Bowden can find the necessary spare parts from within the organization I can see them attempting to trade for similair quality players to fill the void in the rotation.  Florida seems ready to move several arbitration eligble players.  The have to move Dan Uggla, but several SPers are also looking to get big raises and might be obtainable at a reasonable trade cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
