<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screw you, divisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/04/01/screw-you-divisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/04/01/screw-you-divisions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/04/01/screw-you-divisions/comment-page-1/#comment-13442</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/04/01/screw-you-divisions/#comment-13442</guid>
		<description>Well apparently my chances of ever understanding it are poor, given that in my rewrite I somehow decided to start making game wins worth 1 point rather than their actual two, and did my calculations accordingly. Duh.

That said, I feel like I am in comfortable company given that today&#039;s WaPo didn&#039;t even manage to get the calculation correct, stating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040102694.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;the Capitals must finish with more points to beat out the Hurricanes, who hold the tiebreaker.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; While my numbers above were screwed - with the 2 points per win we&#039;re already even with the Hurricanes - the tiebreaking details were accurate - given an even number of points and games played, the team with more wins tops the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well apparently my chances of ever understanding it are poor, given that in my rewrite I somehow decided to start making game wins worth 1 point rather than their actual two, and did my calculations accordingly. Duh.</p>
<p>That said, I feel like I am in comfortable company given that today&#8217;s WaPo didn&#8217;t even manage to get the calculation correct, stating <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040102694.html" rel="nofollow">&quot;the Capitals must finish with more points to beat out the Hurricanes, who hold the tiebreaker.&quot;</a> While my numbers above were screwed &#8211; with the 2 points per win we&#8217;re already even with the Hurricanes &#8211; the tiebreaking details were accurate &#8211; given an even number of points and games played, the team with more wins tops the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhrome</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/04/01/screw-you-divisions/comment-page-1/#comment-13431</link>
		<dc:creator>bhrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2008/04/01/screw-you-divisions/#comment-13431</guid>
		<description>Which is why I just use either The Hockey News or ESPN&#039;s website to figure it out for me.

With tonight&#039;s rather dominating game over the &#039;Canes, the Caps are neck-in-neck at 90, with the tie going to the &#039;Canes. With Tampa and Florida remaining, it&#039;s a better-than-average bet the Caps are skating in by the barest of margins.

After the Pens pummel Philly, that is. Revenge will be indeed be sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is why I just use either The Hockey News or ESPN&#8217;s website to figure it out for me.</p>
<p>With tonight&#8217;s rather dominating game over the &#8216;Canes, the Caps are neck-in-neck at 90, with the tie going to the &#8216;Canes. With Tampa and Florida remaining, it&#8217;s a better-than-average bet the Caps are skating in by the barest of margins.</p>
<p>After the Pens pummel Philly, that is. Revenge will be indeed be sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

