<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Have Our Freedom, But You&#8217;ll Never Take Away Our POSTMARK!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Mail Vigilante</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/comment-page-1/#comment-12721</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Mail Vigilante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/#comment-12721</guid>
		<description>Yeah, as I mentioned on the page, the problem clearly started in Oregon. But how does this not get caught along the way? How does an address that only has one letter of a quadrant marking (in the wrong place); a street name that is not even close to the one it ended up at (I decided to obscure that to protect the addressee); and a city stating &quot;Silverton, Oregon&quot; even get delivered in the District of Columbia? 

In any case, it&#039;s part of a pattern at this one address, and part of the admittedly anecdotal history of terrible DC delivery, some confirmation of which I linked to on that post. I&#039;m not a DC hater--I like it here. But the mail service is pretty bad. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, as I mentioned on the page, the problem clearly started in Oregon. But how does this not get caught along the way? How does an address that only has one letter of a quadrant marking (in the wrong place); a street name that is not even close to the one it ended up at (I decided to obscure that to protect the addressee); and a city stating &quot;Silverton, Oregon&quot; even get delivered in the District of Columbia? </p>
<p>In any case, it&#8217;s part of a pattern at this one address, and part of the admittedly anecdotal history of terrible DC delivery, some confirmation of which I linked to on that post. I&#8217;m not a DC hater&#8211;I like it here. But the mail service is pretty bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Bridge</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/comment-page-1/#comment-12720</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/#comment-12720</guid>
		<description>Let me see if I&#039;ve got this down.

Letter is mailed in Oregon.  To another destination in Oregon.

But the primary fault is with DC?  Huh?  

So it&#039;s DC&#039;s fault that the mail was put in the wrong cart in Oregon, sent by jet to DC, and then it ended up in the hands of a DC lettercarrier?

WTF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I&#8217;ve got this down.</p>
<p>Letter is mailed in Oregon.  To another destination in Oregon.</p>
<p>But the primary fault is with DC?  Huh?  </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s DC&#8217;s fault that the mail was put in the wrong cart in Oregon, sent by jet to DC, and then it ended up in the hands of a DC lettercarrier?</p>
<p>WTF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Mail Vigilante</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/comment-page-1/#comment-12719</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Mail Vigilante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/12/18/you-can-have-our-freedom-but-youll-never-take-away-our-postmark/#comment-12719</guid>
		<description>You know, I was initially supportive of this change. I like DC. I like the idea of statehood.

Then I checked my mail today and discovered a letter sent from Oregon TO an address in Oregon, had been delivered to my house.  I know that this is a Postal Service issue, but the Postal Service in DC was in large part responsible for not catching this egregious error, and it comes on top of the poor service I receive normally. Anyway, you can see what I&#039;m talking about at &lt;a href=&quot;http://dcmailsucks.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://dcmailsucks.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I was initially supportive of this change. I like DC. I like the idea of statehood.</p>
<p>Then I checked my mail today and discovered a letter sent from Oregon TO an address in Oregon, had been delivered to my house.  I know that this is a Postal Service issue, but the Postal Service in DC was in large part responsible for not catching this egregious error, and it comes on top of the poor service I receive normally. Anyway, you can see what I&#8217;m talking about at <a href="http://dcmailsucks.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://dcmailsucks.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

