<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTicket?  Nope.  iPark.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8336</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8336</guid>
		<description>Great, so now we have a *third* method of paying for parking.  I guess I don&#039;t need to worry about the dozens of meters which don&#039;t take my ParkSmart card now - but can I apply the balance to the iPark?  Probably not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, so now we have a *third* method of paying for parking.  I guess I don&#8217;t need to worry about the dozens of meters which don&#8217;t take my ParkSmart card now &#8211; but can I apply the balance to the iPark?  Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krempasky</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8335</link>
		<dc:creator>Krempasky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8335</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s zone-specific. That said, running out to your car to reset your iPark is a lot better than running out to the store to get quarters to run out to your car to re-feed your meter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s zone-specific. That said, running out to your car to reset your iPark is a lot better than running out to the store to get quarters to run out to your car to re-feed your meter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8334</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8334</guid>
		<description>The FAQ on their site makes it very clear you can NOT exceed parking time limits, Mike &amp; Brian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FAQ on their site makes it very clear you can NOT exceed parking time limits, Mike &amp; Brian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8333</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8333</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s sweet.  Between that and the website that tells you where parking spaces are available, parking just got much easier.

I&#039;d also like to have a laser that automatically zapped parking meter enforcement officers just as they were about to ticket my car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s sweet.  Between that and the website that tells you where parking spaces are available, parking just got much easier.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to have a laser that automatically zapped parking meter enforcement officers just as they were about to ticket my car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8332</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8332</guid>
		<description>Pay just for the minutes you&#039;ve parked?  That is extremely cool.  But yeah, does it allow you to exceed time at limited-time meters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay just for the minutes you&#8217;ve parked?  That is extremely cool.  But yeah, does it allow you to exceed time at limited-time meters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8331</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8331</guid>
		<description>But will it pay for 3 hours at a 2-hour meter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But will it pay for 3 hours at a 2-hour meter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/comment-page-1/#comment-8330</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.metblogs.com/2007/03/29/iticket-nope-ipark/#comment-8330</guid>
		<description>Now THIS would be neat. From the FAQ: 

&quot;An iPark device can accommodate up to thirty-six meter zones. That means that multiple jurisdictions could be programmed into the same device. We&#039;d like to see iPark adopted throughout the Washington, DC metro area. When other jurisdictions join the program, the Treasurer&#039;s Office will offer to replace existing iParks with new, multi-jurisdiction devices.&quot;

We need to get DC and Fairfax down with this deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now THIS would be neat. From the FAQ: </p>
<p>&#8220;An iPark device can accommodate up to thirty-six meter zones. That means that multiple jurisdictions could be programmed into the same device. We&#8217;d like to see iPark adopted throughout the Washington, DC metro area. When other jurisdictions join the program, the Treasurer&#8217;s Office will offer to replace existing iParks with new, multi-jurisdiction devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>We need to get DC and Fairfax down with this deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

