Comments on: DC 101 Ads?

By: Chris R.

Chris R. — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:48:25 +0000

I agree that the commercials are low budget. But to say that they dont represent the show doesnt make sense. The show in no way can be defined because they go over anything and everything on any given day. Its not just sex. You must not listen to it very often. A lot of the show is Elliot making fun of Flounder. Seems to me the commercial is a pretty good representation.

I listen to Elliot avidly because he doesnt involve himself in corny humor or political BS. He talks about whats on his mind and does so in a way that doesnt seem fake.

If you dont like him, there are probably 15 other stations you can choose from.

By: Charita

Charita — Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:07:49 +0000

I seen the commercial as well for the first time while watching Las Vegas.Indeed it could’ve been better yet I found myself running to the T.V. the second I heard Elliots voice.I’ll remain a devout listener simply because he doesn’t water down a damn thing he does & neither does The Class.E.I T.M is the best that happened to morning radio in D.C.in AGES :::sm311 my face:::

By: Don

Don — Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:17:42 +0000

I can understand the ads somewhat – the best way to get me to listen to Elliot in the Morning would be to obscure what the show is actually like.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:49:55 +0000

Those ads are equally as bad as the Elliot show, the only thing missing was that annoying laugh of his.

By: TOM MILLS

TOM MILLS — Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:19:16 +0000

They had those silly TV commercials airing during the Orange Bowl last night – my son pointed it out to me as he screamed out “Daddy, it’s Elliot in the Morning” and “Look, there’s Flounder”. In the ads we saw, you couldn’t really tell what the show was all about, since all The Class did was introduce themselves. I’ll agree that overall, the commercials sucked.

By: darpino

darpino — Wed, 04 Jan 2006 06:14:27 +0000

These commercials blow.